<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ranting2.0</title> <atom:link href="http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/04/16/ranting20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/04/16/ranting20/</link> <description>Journal, tech tips, and photo blog of Alex Leonard</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Food IdolIsm</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/04/16/ranting20/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link> <dc:creator>Food IdolIsm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:19:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=551#comment-111</guid> <description>Asparagus I know Web 2.0 has always meant User Generated Content.
The Web Designing Technocrats and Net-Savvied Populous coined it to differentiate between professional/industrially-created sites and Home-Made or Unreferenced Information.
Maybe Wiki was the beginning of 2.0, but I say it again, isn&#039;t it just below-the-line (i.e. user-to-user) blogism?(slash-journalism/advertising)
As for 3.0 ... hmmm .. i think it&#039;s already been ticked with Stumble ratings / Yahoo Answers / Google Predictive Search etc... in so far as the biggest stats, divided by the most common tags equals the lowest common denominator result. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asparagus I know Web 2.0 has always meant User Generated Content.</p><p>The Web Designing Technocrats and Net-Savvied Populous coined it to differentiate between professional/industrially-created sites and Home-Made or Unreferenced Information.</p><p>Maybe Wiki was the beginning of 2.0, but I say it again, isn&#039;t it just below-the-line (i.e. user-to-user) blogism?(slash-journalism/advertising)</p><p>As for 3.0 &#8230; hmmm .. i think it&#039;s already been ticked with Stumble ratings / Yahoo Answers / Google Predictive Search etc&#8230; in so far as the biggest stats, divided by the most common tags equals the lowest common denominator result.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
