<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 64 bits of head wreck</title> <atom:link href="http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/</link> <description>Journal, tech tips, and photo blog of Alex Leonard</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:37:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Alex Leonard</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link> <dc:creator>Alex Leonard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-322</guid> <description>That&#039;s lovely. It&#039;s great how companies embrace improvements and change so much. Waves were the same - super high-end, high-cost plugins and they actually didn&#039;t know if they&#039;d work in 32 bit emulation mode. Great.
You&#039;d think when it gets to some of the bigger convolutions etc that having lots of RAM and working in the 64 bit domain would make a lot of sense..
It&#039;s all very confusing. I&#039;m still confused. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s lovely. It&#039;s great how companies embrace improvements and change so much. Waves were the same &#8211; super high-end, high-cost plugins and they actually didn&#039;t know if they&#039;d work in 32 bit emulation mode. Great.</p><p>You&#039;d think when it gets to some of the bigger convolutions etc that having lots of RAM and working in the 64 bit domain would make a lot of sense..</p><p>It&#039;s all very confusing. I&#039;m still confused.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spectac</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link> <dc:creator>spectac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:27:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-321</guid> <description>Not audio related however, we use 64bit vista machines in work for AutoCAD 3D projects. AutoCAD crashes everytime you close a drawing. Autodesk&#039;s answer: &quot;We don&#039;t really klnow what that&#039;s about, sure it&#039;s the 64bit version of windows and quite frankly not many use it so we don&#039;t care&quot;...not in so many words, but you get the picture. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not audio related however, we use 64bit vista machines in work for AutoCAD 3D projects. AutoCAD crashes everytime you close a drawing. Autodesk&#039;s answer: &quot;We don&#039;t really klnow what that&#039;s about, sure it&#039;s the 64bit version of windows and quite frankly not many use it so we don&#039;t care&quot;&#8230;not in so many words, but you get the picture.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Leonard</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link> <dc:creator>Alex Leonard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:18:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-320</guid> <description>Aye, I don&#039;t think the 64 bit handling is particularly better - just because the software makers are behind (in my eyes). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye, I don&#039;t think the 64 bit handling is particularly better &#8211; just because the software makers are behind (in my eyes).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spewey Walshe</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link> <dc:creator>Spewey Walshe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:47:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-318</guid> <description>You should probably just get a mac so. Sure it may not be able to handle 64 bit stuff any better but it&#039;ll look pretty. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should probably just get a mac so. Sure it may not be able to handle 64 bit stuff any better but it&#039;ll look pretty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Leonard</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link> <dc:creator>Alex Leonard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:08:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-317</guid> <description>Certainly things seem very solid on Linux 64 bit. I was running Xubuntu on my laptop for a good while there and the 64 bit factor is completely transparent - you just don&#039;t notice issues with running a 64 bit OS.
I really would love to be able to give Windows the shove, but unfortunately from a music production point of view it really isn&#039;t an option. I have enough trouble with people bemoaning the fact that I&#039;m not using Mac and ProTools.. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly things seem very solid on Linux 64 bit. I was running Xubuntu on my laptop for a good while there and the 64 bit factor is completely transparent &#8211; you just don&#039;t notice issues with running a 64 bit OS.</p><p>I really would love to be able to give Windows the shove, but unfortunately from a music production point of view it really isn&#039;t an option. I have enough trouble with people bemoaning the fact that I&#039;m not using Mac and ProTools..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: P&#225;draig Brady</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link> <dc:creator>P&#225;draig Brady</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:52:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-316</guid> <description>Interestingly on linux it&#039;s gone the other way. Since many of the developers use 64 bit systems, 32 bit support can be a little buggy these days. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly on linux it&#039;s gone the other way. Since many of the developers use 64 bit systems, 32 bit support can be a little buggy these days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Leonard</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link> <dc:creator>Alex Leonard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:06:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-315</guid> <description>I know, I&#039;m just talking about general consumer usage.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pixelapes.com/2009/01/23/slowly-moving-over-to-64-bit-computing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ve already talked about this over on Pixelapes&lt;/a&gt;, when in 2003 the average punter like you or me could realistically get a 64bit chip with &quot;the launch of AMD&#039;s 64-bit x86-64 extension to the x86 architecture, processors based on this architecture&quot; became common in high-end PCs.
Anyway, the main point is that it&#039;s not like they couldn&#039;t have seen it coming.. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I&#039;m just talking about general consumer usage.</p><p><a
href="http://www.pixelapes.com/2009/01/23/slowly-moving-over-to-64-bit-computing/" rel="nofollow">I&#039;ve already talked about this over on Pixelapes</a>, when in 2003 the average punter like you or me could realistically get a 64bit chip with &quot;the launch of AMD&#039;s 64-bit x86-64 extension to the x86 architecture, processors based on this architecture&quot; became common in high-end PCs.</p><p>Anyway, the main point is that it&#039;s not like they couldn&#039;t have seen it coming..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://alex.leonard.ie/2009/08/31/64-bits-of-head-wreck/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://alex.leonard.ie/?p=699#comment-314</guid> <description>pah! 6 years. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#History&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#History&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pah! 6 years. <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#History" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#History</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
